From e8b263cf161d34bdf59084ac0910b293bf1bedb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dhananjay Balan Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 00:01:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Use a Link! --- blog/2019-04-05-on-captive-portals.markdown | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blog/2019-04-05-on-captive-portals.markdown b/blog/2019-04-05-on-captive-portals.markdown index 25327a1..bb50fa5 100644 --- a/blog/2019-04-05-on-captive-portals.markdown +++ b/blog/2019-04-05-on-captive-portals.markdown @@ -48,4 +48,4 @@ So yeah, I think captive portals are BAD. [^1]: There are one that hijacks DNS, but usually devices have DNSs cached, so that seems to be not popular. [^2]: This could also be because firefox is caching `301` redirects it has seen before. -[^3]: I run a similiar URL at `nossl.dbalan.in`, but you should trust mozilla one than my tiny server. +[^3]: I run a similiar URL at , but you should trust mozilla one than my tiny server.